About this job
We need to output HTML description only, using
and
- /
- . No headings, no markdown. Must not invent facts beyond snippet. We have title, company, location, salary. Snippet says location Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite) but location field says Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria. There’s discrepancy. We must not invent facts; we need to decide which is correct? The snippet says location Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite). The job facts location: Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria. Both are near each other. We cannot invent; we must stick to provided facts. The snippet says location Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite). The job facts location: Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria. Which one to use? The instruction: “Do NOT invent specific facts that are not implied by the provided snippet or fields”. The fields include location: Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria. The snippet includes location: Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite). They differ. We cannot say both are true; we must not invent. Perhaps we can note that the role is based in Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria (as per company location) and note that the role is onsite (as per snippet). The snippet says location Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite). Could be a mismatch but we can combine: location: Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria (onsite). The snippet says Barrow-In-Furness (Onsite). Might be a typo; but we cannot invent. We could phrase: “Based in Askam-In-Furness, Cumbria (onsite)”. That uses the location from fields and adds onsite from snippet. That’s not inventing; it’s combining given info. Salary: £43,212 – £43,212 / year (i.e., fixed). Snippet says £42,215 (commensurate). There’s a discrepancy. We must not invent; we have two different salary figures. We must not present guesses as confirmed facts. We could note that the salary is around £43k per annum (as per job facts). The snippet says £42,215. We could not say both. Perhaps we can state: “Salary: circa £43,000 per annum”. That’s approximating but not inventing exact figure? It’s still approximating based on given figure. Might be okay. Safer: Use the exact figure from job facts: £43,212 per year. The snippet says £42,215 but we can’t say both; we must choose one. The instruction: do not invent specific facts not implied by provided snippet or fields. The fields give a salary range. So we should use that. The snippet also gives a salary but different; but we can’t say both are true. We could note that salary is competitive and in line with market rates, but not give a number. But we need to include salary info. Probably best to use the figure from job facts as it’s more precise. We’ll not mention the snippet’s figure.
We need to write description with responsibilities typical for Principal Quality Engineer – Assurance (NDE). We can use general industry-standard phrasing but must not present guesses as confirmed facts. We can say responsibilities include: leading NDE assurance activities, developing inspection plans, ensuring compliance with standards, coordinating with multidisciplinary teams, maintaining quality records, supporting audits, driving continuous improvement. These are typical but we must phrase as typical responsibilities, not as guaranteed. Use language like “You will be expected to…” but that’s implying it’s a fact. Might be okay as it’s typical. The rule: “You MAY use general, industry-standard phrasing appropriate to the role (e.g. typical responsibilities for a ‘Warehouse Storeperson’) as long as you frame it naturally and don’t present guesses as confirmed facts.” So we can phrase as “Responsibilities typically include:” but we must not present as confirmed facts. Use phrasing like “The role involves…” which is okay as it’s describing the role. It’s not inventing specifics beyond typical. Should be fine.
We need approx 300 words.
Apply
Hiring process handled by the employer
